Case for Heterosexual Civil Partnerships Goes to Supreme Court



The case to make civil partnerships available to everyone is heading to the Supreme Court.

Rebecca Steinfeld, 36, and Charles Keidan, 40, will argue that by only allowing civil partnerships for same-sex couples, the Government is contravening equality laws.  


They believe that if there’s a choice to be had then it should be available to everyone regardless of sexual orientation.


And for better or worse, marriage comes with a lot of baggage; it isn’t everyone that wants religion and patriarchy associated with their relationship.


But marriage does offer couples a number of legal, financial and ethical securities that aren’t so easily available to cohabiting couples.


The Court of Appeal had previously agreed that there may be a breach of equality but, as there was talk of scrapping civil partnerships entirely, it argued that the Government should be given more time to reach a solution.


If the Supreme Court overturns the Court of Appeal’s decision, then it’s likely that we’ll see some opposite-sex civil partnerships in the future.


Popular posts from this blog

Wedding Venue Spotlight: Kingswood Meeting House, Hollywood, Birmingham.

UK Pride Events: May 2017

Kilworth House wins Romantic Wedding Venue of the Year for the East Midlands at the English Wedding Awards!

THATMuse: An Alternative to the Same-Old Hen, Stag or Hag Do

Being a Best Man is a Full-Time Job

Guest Who? A Wedding Guest Book with Personality

Can’t buy me love? The cost of a date night in the UK and around the world

Wedding Package with a Three-Course Meal for 50 Guests at Stonehouse Court Hotel (60% Off)

5 Things NOT to Do On Your Wedding Day

LGBT+ Students in the UK - Can You Help With Important Research?