Case for Heterosexual Civil Partnerships Goes to Supreme Court



The case to make civil partnerships available to everyone is heading to the Supreme Court.

Rebecca Steinfeld, 36, and Charles Keidan, 40, will argue that by only allowing civil partnerships for same-sex couples, the Government is contravening equality laws.  


They believe that if there’s a choice to be had then it should be available to everyone regardless of sexual orientation.


And for better or worse, marriage comes with a lot of baggage; it isn’t everyone that wants religion and patriarchy associated with their relationship.


But marriage does offer couples a number of legal, financial and ethical securities that aren’t so easily available to cohabiting couples.


The Court of Appeal had previously agreed that there may be a breach of equality but, as there was talk of scrapping civil partnerships entirely, it argued that the Government should be given more time to reach a solution.


If the Supreme Court overturns the Court of Appeal’s decision, then it’s likely that we’ll see some opposite-sex civil partnerships in the future.


Popular posts from this blog

Match Your Confetti to the 2017 Colours for Spring

THATMuse: An Alternative to the Same-Old Hen, Stag or Hag Do

UK Pride Events: May 2017

Cardology: Same-Sex Valentine's Day Cards

Being a Best Man is a Full-Time Job

Wedding Venue Spotlight: Iscoyd Park, Shropshire

Wedding Package with a Three-Course Meal for 50 Guests at Stonehouse Court Hotel (60% Off)

5 Things NOT to Do On Your Wedding Day

Wedding Venue Spotlight: Ashridge House (Wedding Fayre April 8th 2017)

Guest Who? A Wedding Guest Book with Personality